drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

The Polish pianist and composer Juliusz Zarębski (1854-1885) is a tragic what-if story: he was a late-bloomer who died young yet managed to leave a few masterful compositions to posterity. He was known throughout Europe as a virtuoso pianist and was said to be Franz Liszt's favorite pupil, but had a late start to composing (his earliest published composition being completed when he was 25) and composed only occasionally until the last two years of his life. It was only in 1883, when he was diagnosed with tuberculosis and became too ill to tour as a pianist, that he began to focus on composition, and as a result, fully two-thirds of his compositions date from his last two years.

Zarębski's Piano Quintet, regarded in Poland as his finest work, was both his last composition and his only one that was not for either solo piano or piano four-hands. Zarębski knew even when he began composing it that it would be his last piece, and consciously aimed to make it the capstone of his musical career. Unfortunately it was not to be, at least not for over a century. Much of the music composed in the Russian-occupied part of Poland in the late 19th century was lost in the political turmoil of the era. Zarębski died shortly after completing his Piano Quintet, and it would not be published until 1931. Even after being published, the quintet was not publicly performed for decades. Its earliest known public performance was on Polish radio in 1989, more than a century after its composition. Most performances and recordings have occurred since 2011, the year the quintet was first performed outside Poland.

Since its revival, critics have attempted to compare the Zarębski piano quintet to his contemporaries: Brahms or Liszt or even César Franck. But the piece speaks with Zarębski's own voice throughout, adventurous both in form and harmonic language, from its passionate-yet-subtle opening to its exhilarating finish. The opening movement, lyrical and slightly melancholic, pushes the sonata form almost to its breaking point. After a propulsive first-movement coda, the atmospheric introduction to the slow movement immediately wrong-foots the listener with an unexpected change of key. This material both begins and ends the second movement, as if setting apart the song-like main body as a sort of dream. The third movement is a scherzo in every sense, playing both rhythmically and texturally with a folk-like theme. The last movement starts with an imaginative twist, its opening measures sounding like a repeat of the scherzo that quickly loses momentum. From there, the finale brings the whole piece together, touching on themes from all three previous movements in a kaleidoscopic, exuberant style.

Movements:
I. Allegro
II. Adagio (10:14)
III. Scherzo: Presto (20:31)
IV. Finale: Presto - Allegretto (26:21)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

A surprising number of composers have been unfairly neglected because of the Nazi regime in Germany. Though the rest of the world did not consciously take cues from the Nazis, the status of Germany and Austria in the classical music world meant composers who were banned by the Nazis tended to fall into neglect elsewhere as well, purely through public attention being directed to other composers. Jewish composers were especially likely to disappear from concert programs, of course, but other groups suffered as well. Women had only begun to gain acceptance as composers at the end of the 19th century and some female composers were starting to see their pieces programmed regularly by the 1930s; the Nazi ideology, which demanded traditional gender roles, set them back half a century almost overnight in continental Europe.

That was the fate of the Dutch composer Henriette Bosmans (1895-1952), who was part of the "wrong" groups throughout her career. For most of her life, the highly conservative Dutch musical establishment tended to view local composers as inferior, which made it difficult for Dutch composers to get exposure. Ironically, it was the Nazi German occupation of the Netherlands that gave many Dutch composers their big break: Dutch orchestras began to play more Dutch music as a means of protesting the occupation. The occupiers tolerated it -- with exceptions. Bosmans was one of them. Not only was she a woman, she was of partial Jewish descent and openly bisexual. Though she managed to escape arrest throughout the occupation, her music was banned from public performance in 1941 and she was banned from performing as a pianist in 1942. As a result, her music disappeared from concert halls just as Dutch music saw a great resurgence.

Although Bosmans did not play the cello herself, many pieces she composed before 1930 featured it as a solo instrument -- perhaps not coincidentally, her father had been principal cellist of the Amsterdam Concertgebouw Orchestra, but died of tuberculosis before she was a year old. Bosmans' Cello Sonata, composed in 1919, was one of these pieces. (It was completed a month before Elgar's Cello Concerto, with which it seems to share some musical vocabulary.) A passionate late-Romantic virtuoso piece, it features the cello in a "vocal" role in the first three movements. A stormy finale in 5/4 time circles back to conclude with an intensified version of the opening theme of the entire sonata.

Movements:
I. Allegro maestoso
II. Un poco allegretto (9:26)
III. Adagio (14:04)
IV. Allegro molto e con fuoco (17:41)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Franz Xaver Wolfgang Mozart (1791-1844) could have been considered a great child prodigy. His first published piece, a piano quartet, was published when he was 11 years old and may have been composed as early as two years before that. Unfortunately for him, he lived in the shadow of a father he never knew. He was one of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's two children who survived infancy; his famous father died when he was just five months old.

Both Franz and his brother Karl were gifted pianists. Karl gave up music, went to work for a trading firm, and eventually became a civil servant. Franz, however, received a first-rate musical education, first from his father's rival Antonio Salieri, then from Johann Nepomuk Hummel and finally Ludwig van Beethoven. He had a peripatetic but financially successful career as a pianist, teacher, and conductor: seeking to escape comparisons to his father in Vienna, he spent much of his life in various towns in modern-day Poland and Ukraine where skilled musicians were rare and accordingly well-paid. He returned to Vienna in 1838, and in 1841 moved to his father's hometown of Salzburg where he directed the choir of the newly-founded Mozarteum for the last three years of his life.

Though highly regarded during his life as a pianist and conductor, Franz Mozart was introverted and given to self-deprecation. He constantly underrated his own ability and compared himself unfavorably to his father. His career as a composer was short: he composed very little after 1820, and had an 11-year period from 1828 to 1839 in which he completed nothing at all. Some of his work was misattributed to other composers, including one late piano piece that was believed until 1994 to have been composed by a young Liszt. His small output included a single symphony, two piano concertos, and an assortment of chamber music, solo piano music, and choral music.

Franz Mozart's second piano concerto was perhaps the piece that showed his promise more than any other. It was composed in 1818, as he was beginning to write in his mature style; it is also one of his last works, as he all but stopped composing soon afterward. Most of his earlier compositions could have passed for his father's late works; by this point his style was developing into an early Romanticism under the influence of Beethoven. Parts of the concerto seem to foreshadow Chopin as well, which might be unsurprising both because Franz's teacher Hummel was one of Chopin's favorite composers and because he was living in Poland when he composed this concerto.

Movements:
I. Allegro con brio
II. Andante espressivo (13:37)
III. Rondo: Allegretto (17:45)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Or, shall we say... Bloch Friday?

Appropriately for Thanksgiving weekend, Ernest Bloch (1880-1959) was an immigrant to the United States, where he was the founding director of the Cleveland Institute of Music and was instrumental in developing the San Francisco Conservatory of Music into a leading music school. He is widely considered to be his native Switzerland's greatest composer, and is especially noted for his many pieces that draw from his Jewish heritage.

Surprisingly, though his own primary instrument was the violin, Bloch only ever composed one violin concerto, a remarkable piece that has somehow remained one of his more rarely performed works. Unusually for him, the main musical inspirations for his concerto were not Judaic but Native American; this may have contributed to its obscurity as Bloch has been remembered largely as a Jewish composer.

Bloch began work on his violin concerto in 1930, when he had extensive, underappreciated contacts with Native American tribes. In the 1920s, his daughter Suzanne (later a professor at Juilliard herself) was romantically involved for several years with a Canadian Ojibwe chief named Charlie Potts, which led to a lifelong friendship between Ernest Bloch and Potts. From 1928 to 1930, while living in San Francisco, Bloch attended synagogue with a man named Solomon Bibo who had become a member of the Acoma Pueblo tribe through marriage and subsequently been elected to serve as the tribe's chief for four years. (To this day, Bibo remains the only person without Native American ancestry to lead any Native American tribe.) By the time Bloch met him, Bibo's voice had been one of those recorded by ethnomusicologists seeking to preserve the Southwest's Native American songs. Beyond his friendships with Charlie Potts and Solomon Bibo, Bloch spent a fair amount of time transcribing Native American music during vacations in upstate New York.

In Bloch's concerto, the themes are original rather than Native American, but incorporate elements characteristic to the music of specific tribes. Bloch attempted to construct themes that could have come from Native American musicians, which was the same approach that he took to his Judaic music. Although Bloch never identified any of the source material he used, his imitation of Native American musical styles was comprehensive enough that most of the themes are identifiably inspired by either Ojibwe or Pueblo music. The first movement, alternately heroic and meditative, incorporates melodies that draw from northern Ojibwe singing styles, beginning with its opening orchestral fanfare. This is followed by a serene yet plaintive slow movement that unusually omits the orchestral strings almost entirely. The third movement brings the piece together as the violin reflects on and sometimes dances around themes heard in the first two movements.

Bloch completed his concerto in 1938, and it premiered the same year with Joseph Szigeti as soloist with the Cleveland Orchestra. Szigeti continued to perform the concerto for the rest of his career. But despite the reputations of both Bloch and Szigeti, it did not catch on. It was likely overshadowed by Bloch's fame as a proponent of Jewish music. At the composer's death in 1959, Szigeti remained the only violinist who had ever played it, and performances remained extremely rare until the 1990s.

Movements:
I. Allegro deciso
II. Andante (20:10)
III. Deciso (26:18)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Marianna Martines (1744-1812) has one unusual coincidence in her biography. As a child, she was Franz Joseph Haydn's downstairs neighbor; but even though she became a composer of some note herself, she seems to have benefited very little from her contact with Haydn.

Contrary to what her name might suggest, Martines lived her entire life in Vienna. Her grandfather was a Spanish soldier who settled in Naples; her father was born in Italy and worked at the office of the papal nuncio in Vienna from the 1720s onward. When she was born, the Martines family lived in a third-floor apartment on the Michaelerplatz in Vienna. Above them was the young Haydn, still a struggling freelance keyboard player many years removed from accepting the position at the Esterházy court that defined his career. The Martines family shared their apartment with a family friend, the poet and opera librettist Pietro Trapassi, who wrote under the name Metastasio. Metastasio had been named the Poet Laureate of the Austrian Empire in the 1730s, and his connections gave the young Marianna Martines opportunities to develop her musical talents. She was initially inclined to singing, and received lessons from Nicola Porpora, who had taught many of the leading opera singers of the day. Porpora, coincidentally, frequently hired Haydn as an accompanist for his pupils, so it is likely that Martines was accompanied by Haydn at times. Martines also briefly took keyboard lessons from Haydn but never studied music theory or composition with him -- Haydn himself was still a student of music theory, with his own earliest pieces dating from 1753. Instead, her education in music theory and composition came from Empress Maria Theresa's court composer Giuseppe Bonno.

It is unclear when Martines began to compose in earnest, as the majority of her manuscripts were lost in a fire in 1927 along with most of her personal papers. Her earliest surviving compositions, though, are not small pieces -- she composed two settings of the Catholic mass in 1760, at the age of 16, and both were performed the same year. She produced mainly sacred music early on, only transitioning to mainly instrumental music after Emperor Joseph II mandated simpler styles of church music in 1765. By 1773 her reputation was such that she was the first woman inducted into the Philharmonic Academy of Bologna, a prominent society of composers. The most striking thing about Martines's career, though, is that she was an independent composer for her entire life in an era in which most composers held full-time employment with either the church or some aristocratic household. It would have been socially unacceptable at the time for a person of high social rank (her father had been ennobled for service to the Austrian Empire), especially a woman of such standing, to seek a permanent position as a church or court composer, of course. Martines was also known for holding musical salons at her home, at which both Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Antonio Salieri frequently appeared. She performed with Mozart herself a number of times, both as a singer and as a pianist, and she may have commissioned Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 5

As a composer, Martines was an interesting hybrid of eras, described by one musicologist as "reminiscent of Haydn in athletic mode." She had a penchant for using daring harmonic progressions that foreshadowed late Mozart and Beethoven, but within an otherwise Galant idiom. Her orchestration was especially conservative, retaining the harpsichord as basso continuo well into the 1780s. In part because of that throwback orchestration, performance opportunities dried up in the 1780s and 1790s, and she fell into obscurity during her lifetime; information on her activities after the mid-1780s is very limited.

Martines's C major Sinfonia is the only surviving symphony composed by a woman before 1800. Composed in 1770, it has many of the stylistic hallmarks of the early Classical symphonies that Haydn and Mozart were composing around the same time -- but this is certainly a more "athletic" style of music, breaking the early Classical sense of decorum with some unexpected but confident chromaticism.

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Ignaz Brüll (1846-1907) was one of the most prominent members of Johannes Brahms's circle of musical friends. An excellent pianist, he was Brahms's preferred partner for four-hand piano pieces, and in 1897 he was a pallbearer at Brahms's funeral. He was a popular composer in his day; his operas, as well as his two piano concertos, were performed frequently in Germany and Austria for decades. But he was forgotten quickly in the 1930s: his music was banned by the Nazis because he was Jewish, and he was not well-known enough outside Germany and Austria for his reputation to survive. Only a handful of recordings of his music were made prior to 1999, when a new recording of his piano concertos began a sustained revival of interest in Brüll.

Brüll was born in Prostějov, in the modern-day Czech Republic, but his family moved to Vienna when he was one year old. His parents were both avid amateur musicians: his mother was a pianist and his father was a baritone singer. He did not start learning music at an especially early age, but when he did start, he learned extraordinarily quickly. From his first piano lessons at age eight, he progressed to studying with Vienna Conservatory professor Julius Epstein at ten. At fifteen he received his first public performance as a composer, with Epstein performing the young Brüll's first piano concerto. Brüll himself kept the concerto in his repertoire as a concert pianist for his entire career. While known early on as a pianist, Brüll especially loved the theater and chose to compose operas for most of his career. He was catapulted to widespread fame by his second opera, Das goldene Kreuz (The Golden Cross), in 1875. Not long after, he married Marie Schosberg, a banker's daughter and socialite, and their home became the preferred venue for the Brahms circle's private concerts in Vienna. He ceased touring as a pianist and focused on composition; having composed only sporadically before 1880, he became a prolific composer for the rest of his life.

Though he was mostly an opera composer, Brüll produced a number of finely crafted pieces for the concert hall as well. His only symphony was composed in 1880, the year before his final concert tour as a pianist and around that time that he began to perform frequently in salon concerts with Brahms. Brahms had completed his own first two symphonies only a few years earlier. Perhaps not surprisingly, Brüll's symphony is rather Brahmsian, flowing and introspective, though not composed on as grand a scale. As with Brahms's first symphony, Brüll made the last movement the most substantial, with an extended slow introduction. Also interestingly, there is no true slow movement, but instead a rather relaxed "Allegretto molto moderato" second movement; the slowest part of the entire symphony is the introduction to the finale!

Movements:

I. Molto moderato
II. Allegretto molto moderato (8:54)
III. Scherzo: Allegro assai (13:55)
IV. Molto moderato - Allegro assai (18:51)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's (a slightly belated) Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

It might be surprising that Elinor Remick Warren (1900-1991) is a forgotten composer, considering how recently she was highly successful: between 1970 and 1980 American orchestras performed her music more frequently than any other female composer, but she faded from public view in the 1980s. Warren was the only woman to gain prominence among the generation of American neo-Romanticists that included Samuel Barber, Howard Hanson, and Gian Carlo Menotti. Perhaps it was geography that later removed her from public attention. For most of her career, "serious" American composers gravitated toward New York and other major East Coast cities, while the West Coast was seen as the home of film composers. Warren lived almost her entire life in the Los Angeles area, and was even married to a film producer for 45 years, but was completely dedicated to art music and never composed for film or TV.

Warren was born into a family of amateur musicians in Los Angeles. Both of her parents had once aspired to careers in music, her mother as a pianist and her father as an operatic tenor. In addition to hearing music at home, she was exposed very early on to the full range of musical performance in Southern California: by the age of three she was being taken to Los Angeles Symphony (now Los Angeles Philharmonic) concerts and attending her father's choral concerts. She was improvising on the piano by the age of four and composed her first piece, a waltz, at 5 years and 9 months. She had compositions published by Schirmer and performed by Los Angeles area ensembles by the time she graduated from high school, yet when she went to Mills College in Oakland to study music she decided to train as a singer. Within a year, her teachers had convinced her to move to New York and study composition rather than vocal music. She stayed in New York for five years, studying composition privately and working as a recital accompanist, before returning to Los Angeles where she lived for the rest of her life.

Initially Warren composed mostly art songs and short choral pieces. Her preferred medium changed dramatically after her first attempt at orchestral composition, a setting of Edna St. Vincent Millay's poem The Harp Weaver for chorus and orchestra, premiered in 1936 to great critical acclaim. A choral symphony titled The Legend of King Arthur followed in 1940 with similar success. From then on, virtually all of Warren's output was for orchestra or chorus with orchestra.

By the mid-1940s, Warren began to define herself as a California composer, writing a number of tone poems and orchestral suites inspired by her home state. Along the Western Shore, a suite for orchestra, is one of these pieces, composed intermittently between 1941 and 1954. The three movements are intended to evoke the Southern California coast: hills rising almost directly from the shore, a beach at night, and turbulent coastal waters.

Movements:
I. Dark Hills
II. Nocturne (4:20)
III. Sea Rhapsody (8:00)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Charles Stanford was one of the most influential teachers in British music history: his list of students read like a who's-who of 20th century British composers, including both Gustav Holst and Ralph Vaughan Williams. Asked about his most promising student, though, Stanford named Ivor Gurney (1890-1937) without the slightest hesitation. He qualified that evaluation, though: he said Gurney had the potential to be "the biggest of them all," but was "unteachable."

Gurney never achieved the level of fame that his teacher thought him capable of, but for a different reason. His studies were interrupted by the outbreak of the First World War. He left the Royal College of Music and enlisted as a private soldier in 1915. He was wounded in the shoulder April 1917, recovered and returned to the front, was gassed in September of the same year, and spent much of the rest of the war in a hospital. In March 1918, still hospitalized, he suffered a serious breakdown, attributed to "deferred shell shock." Gurney nonetheless seemed to thrive for a time after the war, returning to the Royal College of Music to complete his studies under Vaughan Williams and composing prolifically for the better part of four years. Some of his music was performed and received critical praise. But underneath his furious creative activity, his mental health continued to worsen. His family had him declared insane in 1922, and he was confined to psychiatric hospitals for the rest of his life with what is believed to have been bipolar disorder and PTSD with psychotic symptoms. Though he continued to play the piano, he almost completely ceased composing. His existing work was forgotten, with two-thirds of his musical output remaining unpublished today.

Today, Gurney is far better known as a poet than as a musician. While serving in the military, he wrote some highly acclaimed poetry that presented an wry, unglamorous view of his wartime experiences. Decades later, he would be one of sixteen Great War poets named on a memorial in Westminster Abbey.

A Gloucestershire Rhapsody was Gurney's most substantial surviving piece of music. While all his other works were completed quickly, this piece took him two full years to compose. He began work on it shortly after his discharge from the army, and finished it in 1921, not long before mental illness ended his career. Though Gurney attempted to have the piece performed, his deteriorating mental health prevented any performance in his lifetime. The premiere did not take place until 2010, nearly ninety years later.

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Julián Carrillo (1875-1965) might be regarded as a Mexican Schoenberg: from more conventional late Romantic beginnings, he gradually abandoned traditional tonality entirely in favor of a radical new approach. In contrast to Schoenberg's serialism, Carrillo became known for microtonal music and for developing his own notation for intervals as small as 1/16th-tones. Carrillo has been highly regarded in avant-garde music circles -- but unlike Schoenberg, whose pieces from his Late Romantic period are still performed, Carrillo's early works have fallen into obscurity.

The youngest of 19 children in a poor family, Carrillo was first noticed when he sang in the children's choir at his church; his church's music director helped him travel to San Luis Potosí, the state capital, for more advanced studies in music. There, he made quick progress and earned scholarships to study first at the National Conservatory of Music in Mexico City, then in Europe at the Leipzig Conservatory beginning in 1899. While in Leipzig, he became concertmaster of the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra and composed several large-scale works including a string sextet and his first symphony. He returned to Mexico in 1904. Over the next fifteen years, while active as a violinist and conductor in Mexico and the United States, he conducted scientific research in acoustics and began to develop his microtonal music theory, which he called “Sonido 13” or “The Thirteenth Sound” because it expanded on the twelve tones of the chromatic scale. Carrillo first introduced Sonido 13 in a paper he wrote in New York in 1916 or 1917 and published in 1922, and his microtonal music received its first performances in Mexico City in 1925. From then on he was known almost entirely for Sonido 13, especially after he met Leopold Stokowski, who went on to commission many of his microtonal pieces for orchestra. Surprisingly, he was nominated for the 1950 Nobel Prize in Physics, for acoustics experiments at New York University in which he showed that the conventionally accepted node law needed to be modified.

Carrillo's String Sextet is one of his early works in the late Romantic idiom. Completed in 1900 while he was a student in Leipzig, it was his second major work, after a mass he composed before leaving Mexico. Although entirely tonal, the Sextet already reflects Carrillo's mature aesthetic. Following Liszt, Carrillo advocated maintaining an “organic” coherence among multiple movements of a piece by using transformations of a single motive across movements. Accordingly, the main themes of all the movements are variations of the opening theme, and echoes of all three previous movements can be heard in the lengthy finale. The piece had a successful premiere in Leipzig, but when Carrillo returned to Mexico, its combination of Lisztian structure and Brahmsian textures baffled Mexican critics, who called it an unconvincing imitation of German music. Along with Carrillo's other early works, it was quickly overshadowed by an entire generation of Mexican nationalist composers and only revived in the last years of Carrillo's life more than 60 years later.

Movements:

I. Allegro con brio
II. Largo non troppo (9:53)
III. Scherzo (18:37)
IV. Allegro brillante (23:58)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

This week's feature is again chamber music, this time by English composer Madeleine Dring (1923-1977), a multi-talented composer who was perhaps better known as a stage actress and singer. She was trained primarily as a composer, entering the Royal College of Music as a composition student at 14, but had a lifelong love for the theater as well -- many of her early compositions were incidental music for theater, radio, and television, and by the time she graduated from the RCM she was regularly appearing in theater productions herself.

Dring has sometimes been described as a "British Gershwin" because, like Gershwin, she spent most of her career writing musical theater and cabaret songs but also produced a number of "serious" pieces for the concert hall. This was in part a result of her theatrical bent, but also stemmed to some degree from her frustration with the musical establishment; in a decade-long correspondence with American composer Eugene Hemmer, she complained of feeling cut off from her fellow composers because of her lack of interest in avant-garde music. The resulting crisis of confidence led her to compose mainly for herself and people close to her: her songs were largely written for herself to perform, and most of her chamber music was composed for her husband Roger Lord, who was principal oboist of the London Symphony Orchestra. Much of her music was not published until the 1990s or later, despite her own efforts during her life and her husband's persistence after her death.

Dring's Trio for Flute, Oboe, and Piano is probably her most frequently-performed piece. It was composed in 1968, and premiered in New York that year with London Symphony Orchestra principal players Peter Lloyd and Roger Lord on flute and oboe respectively and Andre Previn on piano. The first two measures grab the listener's attention immediately and kick off a quirky and charming first movement full of slightly-off-kilter harmonies and rhythmic wit. The second movement contrasts the first with a beautiful simplicity, an extended oboe solo introducing a theme that develops as a relaxed conversation among the trio. Closing out the piece is an irreverent third movement that features a virtuosic double cadenza for the flute and oboe.

Movements:
I. Allegro con brio
II. Andante semplice (3:13)
III. Allegro giocoso (8:06)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Forgotten Masterpiece Friday returns after a three-week break: I was at the CalCap Chamber Music Workshop, then moving to a new apartment. Since I was just playing a lot of chamber music, I'm featuring chamber music this week.

Around the turn of the 20th century, modern art flourished in Vienna in a movement known as the Vienna Secession. Gustav Klimt and other artists, objecting to the conservatism of the Austrian art establishment and especially to the strict requirements imposed on pieces exhibited at the Vienna Künstlerhaus, resigned from the Association of Austrian Artists, opened their own exhibition hall, and turned Vienna into a leading center for modernism. While the Vienna Secession is viewed mainly as a visual arts movement, the Secessionists saw their movement as inclusive of all art forms: their motto was: "To every age its art, to every art its freedom." They welcomed a number of composers into their midst who shared their ideals. The most notable was Gustav Mahler, whose symphonies broke with traditional forms, and whose work, like that of the Secession's visual artists, was greatly influenced by the psychological and philosophical ideas of Freud and Nietzsche. Decades later, when the Nazis came to power and began to impose their ideology on the arts, they banned not only the "degenerate" visual artwork of the Secession, but also the music of composers associated with the Secession. Mahler was famous enough for his reputation to survive intact, but less prominent composers were forgotten.

One of the other composers associated with the Secession was Johanna Müller-Hermann (1868-1941). Müller-Hermann was quite successful in her day; she was one of Vienna's leading musical figures for some time. She was a late-bloomer as a musician: it was not until 1893, after marriage, that she left a job as a primary school teacher to study composition. Nonetheless, she seems to have had a meteoric rise to fame, her music being performed regularly in Vienna from about 1905 onward. In 1918 she was appointed professor of theory and composition at the New Vienna Conservatory, a post she held until 1938, when the conservatory was dissolved following the Anschluss. Her fall to obscurity was rapid. In addition to her style being regarded as "degenerate" by the Nazi regime, Nazi ideology did not tolerate female composers. Between the Nazis' active efforts to erase her from history and the general destruction of the Second World War, she was virtually unknown by 1945.

Most of Müller-Hermann's output was choral music, but she also produced a number of significant orchestral and chamber works. This week's feature is her only string quartet, brought back to light after more than half a century of obscurity in a 1999 recording by the Artis Quartet. Composed in 1907-08, not long after the height of the Vienna Secession, it carries all the hallmarks of the Secession's musical associates: dizzyingly shifting moods, ambiguous tonality, and wry twists on folk tunes, brought together in an intensely personal musical stream of consciousness.

Movements:
I. Moderato - Ruhig fließend
II. Allegro vivace - Feurig und kraftvoll (5:53)
III. Adagio con espressione (10:23)
IV. Allegro con spirito (18:15)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

This week's piece reflects the summer we've had -- or at least the title does.

The coronation of Queen Elizabeth II involved music commissioned from many of the UK's leading composers; the list of composers reads like a who's-who of mid-20th-century British music, and pieces such as William Walton's Orb and Sceptre March have remained in the concert repertoire to this day. Among the composers commissioned for the event was exactly one woman, Doreen Carwithen (1922-2003). Carwithen was known mainly as a film composer; her music was commissioned not for the coronation itself but for the official film that was subsequently produced.

The daughter of a music teacher, Doreen Mary Carwithen started playing music at an early age. She began learning piano and violin under her mother's tutelage at four, switched to cello at school, and was playing in local orchestras while still in high school. Composing came later; she began teaching herself composition in her teens by following scores while listening to BBC music broadcasts, and produced her first compositions of any kind at 16. She won a scholarship to study cello performance at the Royal Academy of Music in 1941, and while there, changed her focus to composition and became the first woman accepted into the Royal Academy's newly-established film scoring program.

Carwithen's career took off rapidly beginning in 1947. That year the London Philharmonic formed a Music Advisory Committee whose express purpose was to select lesser-known pieces to premiere, and the committee's very first selection was Carwithen's concert overture ODTAA (One Damn Thing After Another), which she had composed two years earlier. The piece premiered in March 1947 under the baton of Sir Adrian Boult. Thus, Doreen Carwithen had the highly unusual distinction of making her public debut as an orchestral composer with a world-renowned conductor leading a major orchestra. Not surprisingly, Carwithen composed the bulk of her music for films and only a few pieces for the concert hall.

Carwithen was all but forgotten, and then rediscovered, within her own lifetime. Like a number of other film composers of her generation, she was both frustrated with film studio deadlines and unsatisfied with being known only for her film scores, and in the 1960s she retired from film scoring in order to focus on art music. As both a woman and a composer regarded as "only" a film composer, she found opportunities for performance and publication hard to come by. After she married fellow composer William Alwyn in 1975, she stopped composing entirely and for many years devoted herself entirely to promoting her husband's work. It was only in the late 1990s, more than a decade after Alwyn's death, that Carwithen returned to composing. She composed most of what was intended to be her third string quartet, and began sketching a first symphony, but abandoned both after being paralyzed by a severe stroke in 1999. In her final years, though unable to continue composing, she was able to take an active role advising conductors in making recordings of most of her art music.

While not associated with any stage production, ODTAA (One Damn Thing After Another) was inspired by John Masefield's 1926 novel of the same acronymic name, which centers around an Englishman caught up in an ill-fated Central American revolution. The novel, in turn, derived its title from anarchist writer Elbert Hubbard's remark, "Life is just one damn thing after another." Carwithen's overture, while showing no sign of Latin American influence, foreshadows her career as a film composer in its bold cinematic gestures.

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Two weeks ago, we heard a composer who fell into obscurity in part because of his refusal to take sides in the War of the Romantics. Not all of the neutrals suffered, though -- Richard Hol (1825-1904) got his big break because he didn't take sides. Though obscure outside the Netherlands, he was one of the nation's most prominent conductors and composers by the end of his life.

The son of an Amsterdam milkman, Hol studied piano at the Royal Conservatory of Amsterdam and had a rather undistinguished career as a piano accompanist until he was almost 40. Though conservatory-trained as a pianst and organist, he was largely a self-taught composer, composed little before 1860, and was arguably not a mature composer until the middle of the 1860s. Nonetheless, some of his early choral compositions gained notice, which led to his appointment as organist and director of the cathedral choir in Utrecht from 1862 onward. Once settled in one place, he began to compose prolifically, but his compositions remained relatively obscure.

What got Hol national attention was someone else's militant stance in the War of the Romantics. Johannes Verhulst was the unquestioned giant among Dutch conductors at the time. Having studied conducting under Felix Mendelssohn, Verhulst had by 1864 become music director of all of the four most prominent orchestras in the Netherlands: both of the Amsterdam orchestras as well as the orchestras of Rotterdam and Den Haag. Verhulst strongly favored Brahms and the "absolute music" faction; he refused to conduct any program music, and from the late 1850s onward he categorically banished all music by Berlioz, Liszt, and Wagner from his concerts. He faced intense criticism for this stance from the public and from the orchestras' financial backers, but never wavered -- and this is where Richard Hol came in. Hol also personally favored the Brahms camp, but had no reservations about conducting anyone's music. During the 1870s and 1880s, the boards of Verhulst's orchestras forced him to accept guest conductors for music from the Wagner/Liszt faction. Hol, seemingly the only person in the Netherlands willing to conduct Wagner, suddenly found himself highly in demand as a guest conductor, which led to the delayed publication of many of his own compositions.

Hol's 3rd Symphony is one of those compositions that saw a long-delayed publication. He completed it in 1867, but it was first published in 1884 when Hol was known as the leading Wagner conductor in the Netherlands. By that point, audiences might well have expected something Wagnerian to come from his pen. They would have been surprised by this symphony. The form is purely classical, and the symphony expressly pays tribute to Mendelssohn, both in a scherzo subtitled "Erinnerung am Mendelssohn 4. Nov. 1847" ("in memory of Mendelssohn") and in a scherzo-like middle section to its slow movement. At the same time, the outer movements seem to look ahead to Tchaikovsky in texture and orchestration, placing Hol's work as a link between the early and late Romantic periods. Unfortunately, by the time this symphony was published, it might have been considered rather conservative -- Tchaikovsky had already completed his 4th symphony -- and as a result Hol himself was perhaps unfairly viewed as a throwback to an earlier era.

Movements:

I. Einleitung und Allegro: Langsam - Lebhaft
II. Scherzo: Zeimlich rasch (Erinnerung am Mendelssohn 4. Nov. 1847) (11:41)
III. Nachtmusik: Langsam doch bewegt (15:34)
IV. Finale: Rasch und kräftig (24:34)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Two days after Independence Day, it seems only fitting to honor a neglected American composer.

Charles Tomlinson Griffes (1884-1920) was eulogized as an American Mozart or Schubert in the days and weeks after his death. After years of obscurity, he had suddenly come across sensational success in the year 1919, earning critical acclaim for one premiere after another, mostly by major orchestras, from March onward. His crowning glory came in November and December of that year: a performance of his tone poem "The Pleasure Dome of Kubla Khan" by the Boston Symphony Orchestra in late November and an all-Griffes concert by the Philadelphia Orchestra in mid-December had critics proclaiming him the great American composer of his generation. But Griffes did not live to enjoy his new-found fame. Seriously ill, he was unable to attend those November and December concerts. He was hospitalized for influenza that December, and though he lived long enough to read the glowing reviews, he succumbed to secondary infections in early 1920, one of the last victims of the global flu pandemic of 1918-19.

But while Griffes's untimely death was a clear parallel to Mozart and Schubert, he was neither a child prodigy nor a prolific composer like his predecessors. He was born in a working-class family in Elmira, New York; early in his life his only musical education was sporadic piano lessons from his elder sister. It was only in his mid-teens that, having progressed beyond his sister's ability to teach him, he began to receive free piano lessons from Mary Selena Broughton, a professor at Elmira College. Eventually, with Griffes's family unable to afford to pay for advanced training, Broughton loaned him the money to travel to Berlin to continue his studies. Though he arrived in Berlin as a piano student in 1903, Griffes found himself increasingly drawn to composition, and by 1905 was exclusively studying composition under Engelbert Humperdinck. But without rich parents, a patron, or any sort of grant to support him, he was forced to cut short his stay in Europe when his money ran out in 1907. He applied for teaching jobs all over the United States, and was hired as a music teacher at the Hackley School in Tarrytown, New York, where he would work for the rest of his life. A full-time teacher who by that time was supporting his widowed mother and his unmarried younger sister, he was both chronically short of funds and chronically short of time. His overwork was made worse by his inability to hire a copyist once his orchestral music started getting performances; he would stay up late at night hand-copying parts. Under those circumstances, it is surprising that he composed as much as he did!

His fall into obscurity was rapid after his death. His younger sister Marguerite, who received all his personal papers, was largely responsible. Charles Griffes had kept meticulous diaries throughout his life, and these diaries dealt honestly with his sexual orientation, detailing his regular patronage of New York's gay bathhouses and long-term relationship with a New York policeman. His sister, fearing scandal, destroyed some of his diaries and withheld all his papers (including musical scores) from public view until 1954. With the exception of "The Pleasure Dome of Kubla Khan," Griffes's orchestral works received few performances in the decades after his death. Most were unpublished and were available only in the form of handwritten copies in the libraries of individual orchestras.

Griffes's style was eclectic. He is sometimes described as an Impressionist, but he in fact studied scores from a wide range of composers throughout his life and constantly added to his musical language. His earliest compositions were conservative and owed much to Brahms, but he soon assimilated influences first from Richard Strauss, then from the French Impressionists, Russian Romantics, Asian musical traditions, and finally from modernists including Schoenberg and Prokofiev. An avid amateur painter and photographer as well as a musician, he frequently expressed a desire to evoke visual imagery with his music. His Symphonische Phantasie dates from his last months in Germany, when he was exploring the music of Debussy and Ravel while retaining a strong sense of the late Romantic idiom in which he had been steeped. During Griffes's life, it was performed only in a two-piano reduction that Griffes prepared in 1910, while the original orchestral version had to wait until the late 1960s for its premiere.

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

In the second half of the 19th century, European musicians were embroiled in what became known as the "War of the Romantics." They sorted themselves into two opposing camps, one rallying behind Wagner, Liszt, and the "music of the future," and another behind Brahms and "absolute music." The Wagner/Liszt camp believed that the traditional forms of instrumental music had been played out and program music was the only way forward, and saw Brahms as boring and stodgy. The Brahms camp saw program music as grandiose wallowing in cheap emotions, believed that music could stand on its own without a dramatic narrative to go with it, and tried to integrate new musical language into traditional forms. Musicians and critics became fanatically devoted to one side or the other; some orchestras even went as far as to hire two conductors, one from each camp, because so many conductors refused to conduct the other side's music. As far as Brahms and Wagner themselves were concerned, the rivalry may have been overblown. The war was driven mostly by critics. Brahms and Wagner disdained one another's philosophies, and Brahms was especially put off by Wagner's spectacular ego, but each held a grudging respect for the other's music. While Wagner derided Brahms in public, he quietly invited Brahms to early rehearsals of his operas and sent Brahms a copy of the score to Das Rheingold with a handwritten note expressing admiration for Brahms's musical craftsmanship. Brahms was more open about his admiration for Wagner's music, jokingly calling himself "the best of Wagnerians" and publicly praising several of Wagner's operas.

Only a handful of musicians bridged the gap between the two camps. August Klughardt (1847-1902) was one of them. Early in his career as a conductor and composer, he was mentored by Franz Liszt, and after attending the first Bayreuth Festival, he became one of Wagner's greatest proponents, conducting several performances of the Ring Cycle. In complete contrast to Klughardt the conductor, Klughardt the composer was far more like Brahms than Wagner. He composed only a few programmatic overtures, and instead focused on symphonies and chamber music. He seems to have attempted to reconcile the two schools; he composed four operas in which he used Wagner's leitmotif technique but held to the old number opera format. Similarly, Klughardt's symphonies and chamber music included rhapsodic passages reminiscent of Liszt but at least loosely followed traditional forms.

Caught in the middle of the War of the Romantics, Klughardt's compositions gained little interest during his life even though he was noted as a conductor. He also suffered somewhat from coincidence: his first two symphonies both had evocative titles that were used by the older and better-known Joachim Raff at the same time. The coincidence did not keep Raff from conducting the premiere of Klughardt's first (and now lost) symphony "Waldleben" (Forest Life) shortly after Raff's own third symphony "Im Walde" (In the Forest); and the two composers each apologized for not giving the other any advance notice of what they were working on when each completed a symphony titled "Lenore" the same year. Both times, Raff's work overshadowed Klughardt's. Today, Klughardt's cello concerto, wind quintet, and Schilflieder ("Reed Songs") are occasionally performed, and most of his other music has been all but forgotten.

(Raff's 9th symphony, "Im Sommer," has been featured in a past Forgotten Masterpiece Friday post.)

Klughardt composed his Piano Quintet in 1884, at the height of his career. It was possibly Klughardt's most successful work during his life, hailed as a masterpiece after performances across Germany and France. Just as Klughardt tried to synthesize the ideas of both camps in the War of the Romantics, his Piano Quintet is a synthesis of two different impulses. Here, the balance is between the intimacy of chamber music and Klughardt's instinct for symphonic music, pulled together to create a strikingly unique style with broad quasi-orchestral gestures and finely balanced interplay between solo instruments both abundantly in evidence.


drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Since I'm both a musician and a soccer fan, one of the highlights of the World Cup for me is hearing the national anthems. Some are musically much more interesting than others, of course; one reason I'm enjoying Iceland's appearance is that the Icelandic national anthem is one of my favorites. But today I'm looking farther back, to the second international match I ever attended and the first for which I got into the stadium in time for the national anthems. Back in 2002, I was in the stadium when DaMarcus Beasley scored his first international goal, a late winner against South Korea in Pasadena, California. But before the match, I was intrigued by the South Korean national anthem "Aegukga," especially the rather Brahmsian use of shifting barlines in its opening phrase. Investigating further, I learned that South Korea's national anthem was once sung to the tune of "Auld Lang Syne" and had been adopted in that form by the Korean government in exile; the present music was composed in the 1930s by a Korean composer who believed "Auld Lang Syne" unfit for use as a national anthem, and adopted (with the same lyrics) by the newly formed South Korean government in 1948.

It turns out the story is even more fascinating than that: though intended from the start as a national anthem, "Aegukga" was first heard in public not as a stand-alone song but as a choral component in a larger symphonic poem. And it was first heard not in Korea or even in China (where the Korean government in exile was located), but in Dublin, Ireland. The composer, Ahn Eak-Tai (1906-1965), was one of the earliest notable Korean composers in the Western tradition, the first Asian principal player in a professional orchestra outside Asia, and the first Asian music director of a professional orchestra outside Asia.

Ahn Eak-Tai was born in Pyongyang several years before Japan took control of the Korean Peninsula. He was introduced to Western music while in elementary school, when his eldest brother, who had gone to Tokyo for higher education, brought back a violin and phonograph records from Japan. Ahn Eak-Tai began learning the violin then; in middle school he switched first to trumpet and then to cello, which would remain his primary instrument for the rest of his life. In 1919, he joined his brother in Tokyo, where in 1926 he was part of the first-ever entering class at the newly founded Tokyo Conservatory of Music. Upon graduation in 1930, he returned to Pyongyang briefly. But after the Japanese police forced him to cancel a scheduled recital because of his involvement in pro-independence protests, he realized it would be difficult to continue his career in Korea, and departed for advanced studies in the United states shortly afterward. He would not return to Korea for 25 years. Ahn's first stop in the United States was Cincinnati, where he studied composition at the Cincinnati College of Music. During his first year there, he auditioned for and won the principal cello seat in the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, becoming the first Asian to hold a principal player's seat in any orchestra outside Asia. In 1932 he transferred to the Curtis Institute of Music; as a student there he played in the Philadelphia Orchestra and got his first conducting job as choir director at a local church.

It was in Philadelphia that Ahn composed the first version of his Symphonic Fantasia Korea, which won a competition sponsored by the New York Philharmonic. Ahn conducted the New York Philharmonic in the premiere at Carnegie Hall. It was a dismal failure, as many of the musicians refused to follow his direction; angered by what he saw as deliberate sabotage, Ahn threw down his baton and left the stage in the middle of the piece. Somewhat surprisingly, there was no backlash against him, as fellow conductors saw his actions as justified and rose to his defense. Ahn received recommendations to continue his studies in Europe, and left in 1936 to study first in Vienna and then in Budapest under Zoltán Kodály. Kodály encouraged him to be unapologetic about incorporating Asian folk music and departing from Western harmonies in his compositions, and inspired him to begin revising the Symphonic Fantasia Korea.

By the time Ahn completed his studies, war was on the horizon. He remained in Axis nations throughout the Second World War. Having impressed when filling in for Richard Strauss on short notice to conduct a concert in Budapest, he became Strauss's cover conductor, and Strauss's recommendation earned him frequent guest conducting appearances with the Rome Philharmonic Orchestra and the Conservatoire Orchestra in Paris. After the war, he sought to return to the United States, but his association with Strauss, who had worked with the Nazi regime, frustrated his attempts to find a conducting job in America. (Ahn was only able to find conducting engagements in the United States after it became evident that Strauss had not shared the Nazis' ideology.) With no job prospects in the United States, and having married a Spanish woman, he settled on the island of Mallorca, where he founded the Orquesta Sinfónica de Palma de Mallorca. He remained in Palma de Mallorca, serving as music director of the orchestra there until his death in 1965. Eventually he made his return to Korean musical life as well, beginning in 1955 as a guest conductor with the Seoul Philharmonic and subsequently making frequent guest conducting appearances with South Korean orchestras. Late in his life, he regarded himself as a musical ambassador not only for Korea but also for his adopted home, drawing from the folk music of the Balearic Islands for several compositions including his recently-rediscovered symphonic poem Mallorca.

As for the Symphonic Fantasia Korea, Ahn's revisions lengthened the piece greatly, to nearly half an hour in length. The largest addition was a choral component; the last seven or eight minutes of the piece are a choral fantasy on the melody that Ahn composed for "Aegukga" -- he already intended for it to serve as a national anthem when he wrote the melody, but it would be heard first as part of this piece. Other changes included thinning out the orchestration in places where the lush Romantic harmonies of the original version detracted from folk themes. The Symphonic Fantasia Korea premiered in Dublin, Ireland in February 1938; the location was deliberately chosen because Ahn saw a kinship between the long English occupation of Ireland and the ongoing Japanese occupation in Korea. Interestingly, Ahn had intended to use an English translation of the lyrics for the Symphonic Fantasia; it was the Irish choir director who persuaded him to use the original Korean text. After its first performance, Ahn conducted the piece several more times, including in his 1955 return to Korea. Otherwise, even after the adoption of Ahn's theme as a national anthem, the larger piece that from which the anthem was taken saw only occasional performances in Spain and South Korea. Only recently, after the rediscovery of some of Ahn's other scores, has Symphonic Fantasia Korea has seen somewhat of a revival.

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Nancy Dalberg (1881-1949) might be one of the great what-ifs of Danish music. She was Carl Nielsen's assistant, and a skilled enough orchestrator that she completed the orchestration of some of Nielsen's theater music when Nielsen was pressed for time. But she only composed large-scale works of her own for a short time. She was a latecomer to composing, beginning to study composition only in her late 20s after an arm injury prevented her from playing piano; discouraged by hostile conductors and overtly sexist music critics, she ceased writing for orchestra in 1918 and composed only art songs after 1928.

Dalberg was the daughter of Christian Hansen, a pioneering biochemist who became wealthy after inventing the first standardized rennet extract. In keeping with the social norms of the day, she learned to play the piano as a child. However, her wish to continue her studies at the Royal Academy of Music was frustrated as her father did not believe it appropriate for a person of wealth and status. Her marriage in 1901 was somewhat liberating: her husband, an amateur musician and poet, encouraged her to resume her piano studies and pursue a career as a pianist. In 1909, after injuring her arm in a fall, Dalberg stopped playing piano for several years and began to take lessons in music theory and composition with first Johan Svendsen and then Carl Nielsen.

Dalberg was very much Nielsen's protégé: Denmark's leading symphonist conducted the premieres of all of her orchestral works and played violin in the premieres of all three of her string quartets. But other than Nielsen, she found no conductors interested in her orchestral music. Critics were no more encouraging: even the reviews that praised her music were tinged with sexist overtones. One reviewer, while praising the 1918 premiere of her only symphony, wrote: "A lady who writes orchestral works is a great rarity; a lady who attempts a symphony a phenomenon." The same reviewer went to on observe that the symphony "would have done justice to many of her male colleagues" -- undoubtedly a compliment, but implicitly disparaging the ability of female composers -- but criticized the lack of anything "specifically female" in it. Dalberg composed no more for orchestra after that concert, but continued to orchestrate music as Nielsen's assistant. She continued to compose chamber music, some of which was championed by the Hungarian violinist Emil Telmányi, for another decade, but eventually became frustrated by the lack of interest from performers other than Nielsen and Telmányi. Publishers were similarly frustrating to work with; she was only able to have her pieces published by submitting them as "N. Dalberg" rather than with her full name. For the last two decades of her life, Dalberg completed only art songs, though at her death her personal papers included sketches for an unfinished fourth string quartet. After her death, if known for anything at all, it was mainly for the art songs and for the orchestration she did for Nielsen.

The Scherzo for String Orchestra was Dalberg's first orchestral work to receive a public performance. Composed in 1914, it was first performed in November 1915 by the Royal Danish Orchestra, conducted by Nielsen. An example of the "fantastic scherzo" genre that was in vogue in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it is rather more substantial than the typical symphonic scherzo, and passes as if improvisationally through a whole variety of moods and colors. An extended middle section encompasses a theme and variations, including variations featuring solo violin and cello.



(Sorry about the chirping birds, those seem to come from the background video. At least they don't seem like too much of a distraction. I don't actually have a recording of this piece, I know about it because I heard one of Dalberg's string quartets on the radio two or three years ago.)
drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Last week featured a violin concerto allegedly rediscovered through an Ouija board by violinist Jelly d'Arányi. This week's feature is a violin sonata dedicated to d’Arányi.

Frederick Kelly (1881-1916) may have been more notable as an athlete than as a musician. Born in Sydney, Australia, he was sent to England to study at Eton College and went on to complete undergraduate and graduate degrees in history at Oxford. While at Oxford, he became known as one of the leading rowers of the day: he was a member of the Oxford crew, won two of England's three premier single sculling events as an individual rower, and won an Olympic gold medal in 1908 as part of Great Britain's eights crew. He was also an outstanding amateur pianist and composer; he briefly studied piano at the Hoch Conservatory in Frankfurt between his undergraduate and graduate degrees, played chamber music with luminaries including cellist Pablo Casals, and acted as an advisor to the Classical Concert Society for several years. It was in that last role that Kelly first met Jelly d'Arányi in 1909. By 1914, after d'Arányi had moved to London, the two were performing regularly as violin/piano duo partners. It is unclear how far their relationship went beyond that; d'Arányi was said to be smitten with Kelly, but Kelly, at least initially, seemed to view their relationship as platonic. Kelly's diaries, though extensive, provide no clues. (Notably, d'Arányi displayed Kelly's photograph prominently in her home for the rest of her life, and despite numerous proposals, never married.)

In any event, their musical partnership was interrupted by the outbreak of war. Kelly was commissioned into the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve and was eventually sent to the front as an infantry officer. At war, according to his fellow officer Arther Asquith, Kelly was "brave as a lion" but also eccentric, brushing his teeth as many as 12 times a day, wearing white gloves, and carrying around stray cats. During lulls in combat, he occasionally attempted to persuade German soldiers to surrender by playing Wagner. Through it all, he somehow managed to continue composing, working by candlelight late at night in his dugout. He was sent to Gallopoli, where he was inspired to compose a sonata for Jelly d'Arányi; as he worked he kept d'Arányi informed on his progress in regular letters to her. Though he composed the sonata while at war, Kelly evidently did not regard the sonata as a war composition. At one point, he wrote to d'Arányi: "The sonata is all there in my head but not yet on paper. You must not expect shell and rifle fire in it! It is rather a contrast to all that, being somewhat idyllic." Kelly was wounded twice during the ill-fated Gallipoli campaign, but survived and completed the sonata days before the Allied evacuation in 1916. On leave in London, he played the sonata with d'Arányi. Later that year, Kelly went back to the front and was killed in the Battle of the Somme in November 1916. When he died, an unfinished piano sonata was found in his dugout.

D'Arányi played the Gallipoli sonata at Kelly's memorial service, the first public performance of the piece and the only one for over 90 years. It fell into obscurity until an Australian violinist and musicologist named Chris Latham, doing research at the National Library of Australia, noticed repeated references to a violin sonata in Kelly's diaries and could not find a manuscript anywhere in Kelly's papers. He eventually located some of Jelly d'Arányi's surviving relatives through Facebook, and learned that a great-niece in Italy still had the immaculately preserved manuscript. Latham flew to Florence, Italy to bring a copy back to Australia in 2010, and went on to give the second-ever performance in Canberra in 2011.

I. Allegro non troppo


II. Adagio con moto


III. Ground: Allegro non troppo
drplacebo: (Neuro notes)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Robert Schumann was one of the giants of the Romantic era, many of his works standard repertoire. One would assume that anything he composed would be well known and widely performed -- especially a violin concerto composed for one of the most famous violinists of the day. But somehow one of his greatest masterpieces is rarely played and relatively unknown.

In 1853, the violinist Joseph Joachim asked Schumann to write a concerto for him. Schumann took on the job with enthusiasm, fully scoring the concerto in less than two weeks. Not long after, in February 1854, Schumann jumped off a bridge into the Rhine. Though he survived the suicide attempt, the composer was confined to an insane asylum for the rest of his life. The violin concerto was Robert Schumann's last large-scale work and second-last piece of music, followed only by a theme and variations for solo piano composed in early 1854.

Joachim was not enamored with the concerto. He suggested that Schumann's deteriorating mental health was evident in the composition. He persuaded Clara Schumann and Johannes Brahms, who were editing the first complete edition of Robert Schumann's works, to suppress it. Clara Schumann required little persuading, as she disliked most of her husband's late works. Brahms, young and almost completely unknown at the time, acquiesced as well. (Interestingly, Brahms had first met Robert Schumann in person three days before Schumann completed the violin concerto.) The score and parts remained in Joachim's hands. Joachim bequeathed the manuscript, along with the rest of his papers, to the Prussian State Library with the stipulation that it should not be performed or published until 100 years after Robert Schumann's death.

In 1933, a Hungarian violinist named Jelly d’Arányi, a great-niece of Joseph Joachim, claimed to have communicated with Robert Schumann himself through an Ouija board at a seance in London. Supposedly Schumann wanted her to find and perform his lost violin concerto. Another seance directed her to the Hochschule Museum in Berlin; she wrote to the Hochschule but no one responded. Further psychic messages told her to contact her friend Erik Kule Palmstierna, a Swedish diplomat. Palmstierna went to the Hochschule on his next visit to Berlin and was shown a folder marked "Schumann," but it contained only music by other composers. Another visitor, overhearing Palmstierna, directed him to the Prussian State Library, where he found Schumann's concerto buried among Joachim's personal papers. The score was marked "unfinished," but at a subsequent seance Schumann's ghost insisted that it was complete. The story of Schumann's ghost directing d’Arányi to his concerto is, of course, highly questionable; it is likely that d’Arányi was told of Schumann's concerto before her great-uncle's death. Nonetheless, she played a major role in starting the search for Schumann's missing concerto.

As for the concerto itself, d’Arányi would not be the first to play it. The publisher Schott Music sent a copy to Yehudi Menuhin in the United States to ask for his opinion. Menuhin declared Schumann's concerto the missing link between the Beethoven and Brahms concerti and planned to perform the premiere himself. Then the German government claimed the world copyright to it, and insisted that it be premiered in Germany and by a German. The first performance, given in 1937, was by Georg Kulenkampff. It was a failure. Kulenkampff, not a virtuoso violinist and selected by the Nazi government for his ideology, made extensive edits to reduce the difficulty of the concerto. Menuhin gave the first performance of the unedited version in New York later that year with much greater success, and repeated it in St. Louis. Jelly d’Arányi gave the fourth performance, in London at the end of 1937. Despite the successful performances by Menuhin and d’Arányi, the negative reaction to Kulenkampff's premiere prevailed, and Schumann's violin concerto has remained rarely-performed until recently.

Movements:
I. In kräftigem, nicht zu schnellem Tempo
II. Langsam (16:00)
III. Lebhaft, doch nicht schnell (22:08)

drplacebo: (Default)
It's Forgotten Masterpiece Friday!

Germaine Tailleferre (1892-1983) was the only female composer among Les Six, a loosely organized group of composers active in France in the 1920s whose best-known members were Darius Milhaud and Francis Poulenc. She studied under Ravel, but absorbed surprisingly little stylistic influence from him; Les Six in fact coalesced not around any particular style but as a reaction against the impressionism of Debussy and Ravel.

Born Marcelle Germaine Taillefesse, she was forbidden by her father from studying music and was secretly taught to play the piano by her mother, then attended the Paris Conservatory secretly under the name Germaine Tailleferre, which she later made her legal name. Disowned by her father, she eked out a living performing and teaching, never achieving any financial security; she worked as a piano accompanist well into her 80s and composed until a few weeks before her death. Reviews of her music often showed openly sexist condescension -- when one of her pieces was premiered by the Boston Symphony, the Boston Globe's critic had more to say about the novelty of "a pretty girl" taking a bow as composer than about the music itself. Nevertheless, she persisted.

In 1917, with most concert halls closed for the duration of the First World War, Tailleferre and a group of other young composers began holding concerts of their chamber music in an art gallery in the Paris district of Montparnasse, and soon became known as Les Six. Their individual styles varied greatly ("Les Six" was perhaps more about marketing than it was an artistic movement), but they were all influenced by the modernist painters whose work surrounded them, and all pursued a more straightforward, cleaner aesthetic than the impressionists that came before them. The concerts ceased after the war, but Les Six continued to meet regularly at the celebrated Paris jazz club Le Boeuf sur le Toit. It was with Les Six that Tailleferre built her reputation. Her association with Les Six brought regular commissions, and made the 1920s and 1930s her most prolific years; her ballet Le Marchand d'Oiseaux was the most-performed ballet in France in the 1920s. Many of Tailleferre's scores from that era unfortunately disappeared for a number of years: when Nazi Germany invaded France, she departed for the United States, leaving all but a few of her scores behind; while they were eventually recovered, many were unpublished until after her death. After the Second World War, Tailleferre returned to France and resumed her career as primarily a film and television composer, but without the same level of notoriety she had enjoyed before the war.

Tailleferre's Piano Trio represents both the beginning and end of her career. The first and third movements were composed in 1916-17 and performed as a two-movement piece in the art gallery where Les Six first organized their concerts. The second and fourth movements were added in 1978, yet fit in surprisingly seamlessly, and similarly bring to mind the Picasso, Matisse, and Modigliani paintings that surrounded the original trio's premiere in 1917.

Movements:
I. Allegro animato
II. Allegro vivace (4:05)
III. Moderato (7:24)
IV. Trés animé (10:56)


Profile

drplacebo: (Default)
Andrew

August 2019

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags